-
More than a decade ago, cognitive scientists John Bransford and Daniel Schwartz, both then at Vanderbilt University, found that what distinguished young adults from children was not the ability to retain facts or apply prior knowledge to a new situation but a quality they called “preparation for future learning.” The researchers asked fifth graders and college students to create a recovery plan to protect bald eagles from extinction. Shockingly, the two groups came up with plans of similar quality (although the college students had better spelling skills). From the standpoint of a traditional educator, this outcome indicated that schooling had failed to help students think about ecosystems and extinction, major scientific ideas.
The researchers decided to go deeper, however. They asked both groups to generate questions about important issues needed to create recovery plans. On this task, they found large differences. College students focused on critical issues of interdependence between eagles and their habitats. Fifth graders tended to focus on features of individual eagles (“How big are they?” and “What do they eat?”). The college students had cultivated the ability to ask questions, the cornerstone (最重 要部分)of critical thinking. They had learned how to learn.
Museums and other institutions of informal learning may be better suited to teach this skill than elementary and secondary schools. At the Exploratorium in San Francisco, we recently studied how learning to ask good questions can affect the quality of people's scientific inquiry. We found that when we taught participants to ask “What if?” and “How can?” questions that nobody present would know the answer to and that would spark exploration，they engaged in better inquiry at the next exhibit-asking more questions, performing more experiments and making better interpretations of their results. Specifically, their questions became more comprehensive at the new exhibit. Rather than merely asking about something they wanted to try，they tended to include both cause and effect in their question. Asking juicy questions appears to be a transferable skill for deepening collaborative inquiry into the science content found in exhibits.
This type of learning is not confined to museums or institutional settings. Informal learning environments tolerate failure better than schools. Perhaps many teachers have too little time to allow students to form and pursue their own questions and too much ground to cover in the curriculum. But people must acquire this skill somewhere, Our society depends on them being able to make critical decisions about their own medical treatment, say, or what we must do about global energy needs and demands. For that, we have an informal learning system that gives no grades, takes all comers，and is available even on holidays and weekends.
1.What is traditional educators interpretation of the research outcome mentioned in the first paragraph?
A.Students are not able to apply prior knowledge to new problems.
B.College students are no better than fifth grader in memorizing facts.
C.Education has not paid enough attention to major environmental issues.
D.Education has failed to lead students to think about major scientific ideas.
2.College students are different from children in that_____ ?
A.they have learned to think critically.
B.they are concerned about social issues.
C.they are curious about specific features.
D.they have learned to work independently.
3.What is the benefit of asking questions with no ready answers?
A.It arouses students’ interest in things around them.
B.It cultivates students’ ability to make scientific inquiries.
C.It trains students’ ability to design scientific experiments.
D.It helps students realize not every question has an answer.
4.At the end of the passage the author seems to encourage educators to ____.
A.train students to think about global issues
B.design more interactive classroom activities
C.make full use of informal learning resources
D.include collaborative inquiry in the curriculum
高三英语阅读理解困难题查看答案及解析
-
More than a decade ago, cognitive scientists John Bransfgord and Daniel Schwartz, both then at Vanderbilt University, found that knowledge was not the ability to retain facts or apply previous knowledge to a new situation but a quality they called "preparation for future learning." The researches asked fifth graders and college students to create a recovery plan to protect bald eagles from extinction. Shockingly, the two groups came up with plans of similar quality (though the college students had better spelling skills). From the standpoint of a traditional educator, this outcome indicated that schooling had failed to help students think about ecosystems and extinction, major scientific ideas.
The researches decided to go deeper, however. They asked both groups to generate questions about important issues needed to create recovery plans. On this task, they found large differences. College students focused on critical issues. The college students had cultivated the ability to ask questions, the foundation of critical thinking. They had learned how to learn.
Museums and other institutions of informal learning may be more suitable to teach this skill than elementary and secondly schools. At the Exploratorium in San Francisco, we recently studied how learning to ask good questions can affect the quality of people's scientific inquiry. We found that when we taught participants to ask "What if?" and "How can?" questions that nobody present would know the answer to and that would spark exploration, they engaged in better inquiry at the next exhibit—asking more questions, performing more experiments and making better interpretations of their results. Specially, their questions became more comprehensive at the new exhibit.
This type of learning is not limited to museums of institutional settings. Informal learning environment tolerate failure better than schools. Perhaps many teachers have too little time to allow students to form and pursue their own questions and too much ground to cover in the curriculum. But people must acquire this skill somewhere. Our society depend on them being able to make critical decisions about their own medical treatment, says, or what we must do about global energy needs and demands. For that, we have a robust informal system that gives no grades, takes all comers, and is available even on holidays and weekends.
1.What is traditional educators' understanding of the search outcome mentioned in the first paragraph?
A.Students are not able to apply prior knowledge to new problems.
B.College students are no better than fifth graders in memorizing issues.
C.Education has not paid enough attention to major environmental issues.
D.Education has failed to lead students to think about major scientific ideas.
2.In what way are college students different from children?
A.They have learned to think critically.
B.They are concerned about social issues.
C.They are curious about specific features.
D.They have learned to work independently.
3.What is benefit of asking questions with no ready answers?
A.It arouse students' interest in things around them.
B.It cultivates students' ability to make scientific inquiries.
C.It trains students' ability to design scientific experiments.
D.It helps students realize not every question has an answer.
4.What does the author seem to encourage educators to do at the end of the passage?
A.Train students to think about global issues.
B.Design more interactive classroom activities.
C.Make full use of informal learning resources.
D.Include collaborative inquiry in the curriculum.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than four decades ago British scientist Robert Edwards first witnessed the miracle of human life growing inside a test tube at his Cambridge lab． Since that ground-breaking moment, more than four million babies have been born through IVF and in 2010 his great contribution to science was finally recognized as he was awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine．
The prize for Dr Edwards, who was given a Daily Mirror Pride of Britain Award in 2008, includes a ￡900,000 cheque． The Nobel Assembly described IVF as a "milestone in modern medicine"．
With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, the Manchester-born physiologist developed IVF - leading to the birth of the world's first test tube baby． Dr Steptoe died 10 years later but their work has transformed fertility treatment and given hope to millions of couples．
It was a scientific breakthrough that transformed the lives of millions of couples． They said: "His achievements have made it possible to treat infertility, a disease which makes human unable to have a baby． This condition has been afflicting a large percentage of mankind including more than 10% of all couples worldwide．"
Louise Brown, the world's first test tube baby, made international headlines when she was born in Oldham, Gtr Manchester, in 1978 to parents Lesley and John who had been fruitlessly trying for a baby since 1969．
Ivf-in-vitro fertilisation is the process whereby egg cells are fertilised outside the body before being implanted in the womb． After a cycle of IVF, the probability of a couple with infertility problems having a baby is one in five — the same as healthy couples who conceive naturally．
Professor Edwards, who has five daughters and 11 grandchildren, began his research at Cambridge University in 1963, after receiving his PhD in 1955．He once said: "The most important thing in life is having a child． Nothing is more special than a child．" With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, Prof． Edwards founded the Bourn
Hall clinic in Cambridge shire, which now treats more than 900 women a year． Each year, more than 30,000 women in Britain now undergo IVF and 11,000 babies are born as a result of the treatment．
But his work attracted widespread criticism from some scientists and the Catholic Church who said it was "unethical and immoral"．
Martin Johnson, professor of reproductive（生殖的） sciences at the University of Cambridge, said the award was "long overdue"． He said: “We couldn't understand why the Nobel has come so late but he is delighted - this is the cherry on the cake for him．”
Professor Edwards was too ill to give interviews but a statement released by his family said he was "thrilled and delighted"．
1.What is Robert Edwards‘ contribution to science?
A． Challenging a disease which stops human having a baby．
B． Seeing the wonder of the first tube baby growing
C． Enabling millions of couples to live a better life．
D． Helping couples with infertility to have tube babies．
2. What does the underlined word “afflicting”（Paragraph 4）most probably refer to?
A． Troubling B． Developing
C． Improving D． Confusing
3. Why did Professor Edwards begin his research on tube baby?
A． Because he thought it of great significance to have a child in life．
B． Because the birthrate around the world was unexpectedly low then．
C． Because a special child did make a difference to an ordinary family．
D． Because his fellow scientist wanted to give hope to the unlucky couples．
4.It can be inferred from Paragraph 8 and Paragraph 9 that ___________．
A． some people envied Professor Edwards for his being awarded．
B． different opinions were voiced on Professor Edwards‘ finding．
C． Professor Edwards deserved the prize for his breakthrough．
D． the prize was late because the finding was first considered immoral．
5. What might be the best title for the passage?
A． Life Stories of Robert Edwards
B． Preparations for Having a Baby
C． Nobel Prize for IVF Expert Edwards
D． Treatment of Infertility in a Lab
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than four decades ago British scientist Robert Edwards first witnessed the miracle of human life growing inside a test tube at his Cambridge lab. Since that ground-breaking moment, more than four million babies have been born through IVF and in 2010 his great contribution to science was finally recognized as he was awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine.
The prize for Dr. Edwards, who was given a Daily Mirror Pride of Britain Award in 2008, includes a £900,000 check. The Nobel Assembly described IVF as a “milestone in modern medicine”.
With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, the Manchester-born physiologist developed IVF - leading to the birth of the world’s first test tube baby. Dr. Steptoe died 10 years later but their work has transformed fertility treatment and given hope to millions of couples.
It was a scientific breakthrough that transformed the lives of millions of couples. They said: “His achievements have made it possible to treat infertility, a disease which makes human unable to have a baby. This condition has been afflicting a large percentage of mankind including more than 10% of all couples worldwide.”
Louise Brown, the world’s first test tube baby, made international headlines when she was born in Oldham, Gtr Manchester, in 1978 to parents Lesley and John who had been fruitlessly trying for a baby since 1969.
Ivf-in-vitro fertilization is the process whereby egg cells are fertilized outside the body before being implanted in the womb. After a cycle of IVF, the probability of a couple with infertility problems having a baby is one in five—the same as healthy couples who conceive naturally.
Professor Edwards, who has five daughters and 11 grandchildren, began his research at Cambridge University in 1963, after receiving his PhD in 1955. He once said: “The most important thing in life is having a child. Nothing is more special than a child.” With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, Prof. Edwards founded the Bourn Hall clinic in Cambridge shire, which now treats more than 900 women a year. Each year, more than 30,000 women in Britain now undergo IVF and 11,000 babies are born as a result of the treatment.
But his work attracted widespread criticism from some scientists and the Catholic Church who said it was “unethical and immoral”.
Martin Johnson, professor of reproductive sciences at the University of Cambridge, said the award was “long overdue”. He said: “We couldn’t understand why the Nobel has come so late but he is delighted - this is the cherry on the cake for him.”
Professor Edwards was too ill to give interviews but a statement released by his family said he was “thrilled and delighted”.
1.What is Robert Edwards’ contribution to science?
A. Enabling millions of couples to live a better life.
B. Helping couples with infertility to have tube babies.
C. Seeing the wonder of the first tube baby growing
D. Challenging a disease which stops human having a baby.
2.Why did Professor Edwards begin his research on tube baby?
A. Because a special child did make a difference to an ordinary family.
B. Because the birthrate around the world was unexpectedly low then.
C. Because he thought it of great significance to have a child in life.
D. Because his fellow scientist wanted to give hope to the unlucky couples.
3.It can be inferred from Paragraph 8 and Paragraph 9 that ___________.
A. Professor Edwards deserved the prize for his breakthrough.
B. different opinions were voiced on Professor Edwards’ finding.
C. some people envied Professor Edwards for his being awarded.
D. the prize was late because the finding was first considered immoral.
4.What might be the best title for the passage?
A. Life Stories of Robert Edwards B. Preparations for Having a Baby
C. Treatment of Infertility in a Lab D. Nobel Prize for IVF Expert Edwards
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than four decades ago British scientist Robert Edwards first witnessed the miracle of human life growing inside a test tube at his Cambridge lab． Since that ground-breaking moment, more than four million babies have been born through IVF and in 2010 his great contribution to science was finally recognized as he was awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine．
The prize for Dr Edwards, who was given a Daily Mirror Pride of Britain Award in 2008, includes a ￡900,000 cheque． The Nobel Assembly described IVF as a "milestone in modern medicine"．
With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, the Manchester-born physiologist developed IVF — leading to the birth of the world's first test tube baby． Dr Steptoe died 10 years later but their work has transformed fertility treatment and given hope to millions of couples．
It was a scientific breakthrough that transformed the lives of millions of couples． They said: "His achievements have made it possible to treat infertility, a disease which makes human unable to have a baby． This condition has been afflicting a large percentage of mankind including more than 10% of all couples worldwide．"
Louise Brown, the world's first test tube baby, made international headlines when she was born in Oldham, Gtr Manchester, in 1978 to parents Lesley and John who had been fruitlessly trying for a baby since 1969．
Ivf-in-vitro fertilisation is the process whereby egg cells are fertilised outside the body before being implanted in the womb． After a cycle of IVF, the probability of a couple with infertility problems having a baby is one in five — the same as healthy couples who conceive naturally．
Professor Edwards, who has five daughters and 11 grandchildren, began his research at Cambridge University in 1963, after receiving his PhD in 1955．He once said: "The most important thing in life is having a child． Nothing is more special than a child．" With the help of fellow scientist Patrick Steptoe, Prof． Edwards founded the Bourn Hall clinic in Cambridge shire, which now treats more than 900 women a year． Each year, more than 30,000 women in Britain now undergo IVF and 11,000 babies are born as a result of the treatment．
But his work attracted widespread criticism from some scientists and the Catholic Church who said it was "unethical and immoral"．
Martin Johnson, professor of reproductive（生殖的） sciences at the University of Cambridge, said the award was "long overdue"． He said: “We couldn't understand why the Nobel has come so late but he is delighted — this is the cherry on the cake for him．”
Professor Edwards was too ill to give interviews but a statement released by his family said he was "thrilled and delighted"．
1.What is Robert Edwards’ contribution to science?
A． Challenging a disease which stops human having a baby．
B． Seeing the wonder of the first tube baby growing.
C． Enabling millions of couples to live a better life．
D． Helping couples with infertility to have tube babies．
2. What does the underlined word “afflicting”（Paragraph 4）most probably refer to?
A． Troubling. B． Developing.
C． Improving. D． Confusing.
3. Why did Professor Edwards begin his research on tube baby?
A． Because he thought it of great significance to have a child in life．
B． Because the birthrate around the world was unexpectedly low then．
C． Because a special child did make a difference to an ordinary family．
D． Because his fellow scientist wanted to give hope to the unlucky couples．
4.It can be inferred from Paragraph 8 and Paragraph 9 that ___________．
A． some people envied Professor Edwards for his being awarded
B． different opinions were voiced on Professor Edwards’ finding
C． Professor Edwards deserved the prize for his breakthrough
D． the prize was late because the finding was first considered immoral
5. What might be the best title for the passage?
A． Life Stories of Robert Edwards
B． Preparations for Having a Baby
C． Nobel Prize for IVF Expert Edwards
D． Treatment of Infertility in a Lab
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than three decades ago, I was a student at a high school in Southern California. The student body of 3,200 was a melting pot of ethnic groups. The environment was _________.
One day I was walking down the side walk when someone kicked me from behind. Turning ________, I discovered the local gang. Fists came from every _______as the 15 gang members surrounded me. ________I had to have an operation. My doctor told me that if I had been hit in the head _______, I probably would have died.
After I _______, some friends said, “Let’s get these guys!” That was the way _______were “resolved”. A part of me said, “Yes!” But another part of me ________and said no. History has proved time and again that revenge only _______the conflict. We needed to do something different to break the counter-productive(适得其反的) chain of _______.
Working with various ethnic groups, we ______what we called a “Brotherhood Committee” to work on improving ________relationships. I was amazed to learn how much _______fellow students had in building a brighter future.
Two years later, I _______Student Body President. Even though I ran against two friends, one a football hero and the other a popular “big man of the campus”, a significant majority of the 3,200 students joined me in the ______of doing things differently. We made significant progress in building bridges between _______, learning how to talk with and _______different ethnic groups, resolving differences without _______and learning how to build trust in the most difficult of circumstances.
Being stacked by the gang was clearly one of my toughest life moments. What I learned, ______, about
responding with love rather than returning hate has been a ______force in my life. Turning up our light in the presence of those whose light is dim(昏暗的)becomes the difference that makes the difference.
1.A. clear B. tough C. protective D. dirty
2.A. around B. on C. into D. out
3.A. means B. situation C. approach D. direction
4.A. Gradually B. Regularly C. Eventually D. Frequently
5.A. over time B. one more time C. ahead of time D. in no time
6.A. treated B. recovered C. suffered D. calmed
7.A. conditions B. atmospheres C. fantasies D. problems
8.A. paused B. agreed C. started D. proceeded
9.A. remains B. finishes C. continues D. proves
10.A. accidents B. items C. events D. scenes
11.A. put together B. put aside C. put back D. put down
12.A. political B. racial C. civil D. national
13.A. sympathy B. knowledge C. honor D. interest
14.A. voted for B. ran for C. fought for D. called for
15.A. need B. danger C. process D. way
16.A. cultures B. schools C. banks D. ranks
17.A. belong to B. lead to C. relate to D. devote to
18.A. agreement B. demonstration C. justice D. violence
19.A. hence B. however C. moreover D. then
20.A. powerful B. peaceful C. careful D. thoughtful
高三英语完形填空中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than three decades ago, I was a student at a high school in Southern California. The student body of 3,200 was a melting pot of ethnic groups. The environment was____ .
One day I was walking down the side walk when someone kicked me from behind. Turning____ , I discovered the local gang. Fists came from every____ as the 15 gang members surrounded me. ____I had to have an operation. My doctor told me that if I had been hit in the head____ , I probably would have died.
After I ____ , some friends said, “Let’s get these guys!” That was the way____were “resolved”. A part of me said, “Yes!” But another part of me ____and said no. History has proved time and again that revenge only ____the conflict. We needed to do something different to break the counter-productive(适得其反的) chain of ____ .
Working with various ethnic groups, we____what we called a “Brotherhood Committee” to work on improving____relationships. I was amazed to learn how much ____fellow students had in building a brighter future.
Two years later, I____ Student Body President. Even though I ran against two friends, one a football hero and the other a popular “big man of the campus”, a significant majority of the 3,200 students joined me in the ____of doing things differently. We made significant progress in building bridges between ___ , learning how to talk with and ____ different ethnic groups, resolving differences without ____and learning how to build trust in the most difficult of circumstances.
Being stacked by the gang was clearly one of my toughest life moments. What I learned, ___ , about responding with love rather than returning hate has been a____ force in my life. Turning up our light in the presence of those whose light is dim(昏暗的)becomes thedifference that makes the difference.
1.A. clear B. tough C. protective D. dirty
2.A. around B. on C. into D. out
3.A. means B. situation C. Approach D. direction
4.A. Gradually B. Regularly C. Eventually D. Frequently
5.A. over time B. one more time C. ahead of time D. in no time
6.A. treated B. recovered C. suffered D. calmed
7.A. conditions B. atmospheres C. fantasies D. problems
8.A. paused B. agreed C. started D. proceeded
9.A. remains B. finishes C. continues D. proves
10.A. accidents B. items C. events D. scenes
11.A. put together B. put aside C. put back D. put down
12.A. political B. racial C. civil D. national
13.A. sympathy B. knowledge C. Honor D. interest
14.A. voted for B. ran for C. fought for D. called for
15.A. need B. danger C. process D. way
16.A. cultures B. schools C. banks D. ranks
17.A. belong to B. lead to C. relate to D. devote to
18.A. agreement B. Demonstration C. justice D. violence
19.A. hence B. however C. moreover D. then
20.A. powerful B. peaceful C. careful D. thoughtful
高三英语完形填空中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
More than a century ago, the composer and bandleader John Philip Sousa warned that technology would destroy music, who said, “These talking machines are going to ruin the artistic development of music in this country. When I was a boy … in front of every house in the summer evenings you would find young people together singing the songs of the day or th
e old songs. Today you hear these terrible machines going night and day. We will not have a vocal cord (声带) left.”Music has greatly changed in the past hundred years, which has been everywhere in our world: rivers of digital melody flow on the Internet or on disc; MP3 players with forty thousand songs can be put in a back pocket or a purse. Yet, for most of us, music is no longer something we do ourselves, or even watch othe
r people do in front of us. It has become a radically virtual medium, an art without a face.Ever since Edison invented the phonograph cylinder(留声机), people have been assessing what the medium of recording has done for and to the art of music. Sousa was a spokesman for the party of doom; in the opposite corner are the utopians(乌托邦), who argue that technology has not imprisoned music but liberated it. Before Edison came along, Beethoven’s symphonies could be heard only in select concert halls. Now the recordings carry the man from Bonn to the corners of the earth. Glenn Gould, after renouncing live performance in 1964, predicted that within the century the public concert would disappear into the electronic air.
Having discovered much of my favorite music through LPs and CDs, I am not about to join Sousa’s party. Modern urban environments are often so soulless or ugly that I’m grateful for the humanizing touch of electronic sound. But neither can I accept Gould’s slashing futurism. I want to be aware of technology’s effects, positive and negative. Fo
rtunately, scholars and critics have been methodically exploring this terrain for many decades, trying to figure out exactly what happens when we listen to music with no musicians in the room.1.The first paragraph is intended to .
A. defend an argument B. make a prediction
C. criticize an attitude D. summarized a viewpoint
2.The author’s attitude towards the recorded music may best be described as .
A. dissatisfied B. defensive C. optimistic D. objective
3.The underlined word “terrain” in the last paragraph most nearly means .
A. region B. subject C. land D. distinction
4.The primary purpose of the passage is to .
A. explain different attitudes of scholars and critics
B. defend the view of one group from the criticism of another
C. advocate an unexpected solution to a pressing problem
D. present the key issues in an ongoing debate
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
Watching a 3D movie can more than double the concentration powers and cognitive(认知) processing of children, a new research claims.
A study made by visual technology firm RealD and led by child psychologist Dr Richard Woolfson suggests that children aged between 7 and 14 experienced twice the cognitive processing speed and performed better in testing after watching 20 minutes of a 3D film. This is despite suggestions that attention spans(时期) in children have shortened in the last decade due to unlimited to access to entertainment, including on-demand TV, gaming and social media. A 2015 study claimed that watching 3D content had a similar effect to brain-training exercises.
Consumer psychologist Mr Fagan said that the increased stimulation(刺激) found in watching something in 3D "exercised" the brain and improved performance in the short term. "3D films can play the role of ‘brain-training’ games and help to make children ‘smarter’ in the short term," he said. "The shortening of response times after watching 3D was almost three times as big as that gained from watching 2D; in other words, 3D helps children process aspects of their environment more quickly. This is likely to be because 3D is a mentally stimulating experience which ‘gets the brain's juices flowing’."
The experiment saw children given a range of cognitive tests before watching 20 minutes of a movie in either 2D or 3D and being tested again. The results showed those who saw the 3D content reacted faster and performed bettering the second round of testing. Mental engagement also rose by 13% among 3D watchers. Child psychologist Dr Woolfson added that “supportive parenting” and regularly listening to classical music can also aid a child’s memory.
1.The reason why children perform better after watching a 3D movie is that ________.
A. a 3D movie makes their brain active
B. a 3D movie is more exciting than a 2D movie
C. children enjoy watching a 3D movie
D. children like the experience which “gets the brain’s juices flowing”
2.Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
A. Only “supportive parenting” and listening to music can help a child’s memory.
B. The children in the experiment are tested only once.
C. All the children doubled the cognitive processing speed in testing.
D. Children’s attention spans have shortened in the past 10 years because of access of.
3.Where does this passage probably come from?
A. An exhibition guide.
B. A science textbook.
C. A science report.
D. An advertisement.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
-
Watching a 3D movie can more than double the concentration powers and the cognitive（认知的）process of children,new re-search claims.
A study by visual technology firm Read and led by child psychologist Dr Richard Woolfson and associate lecturer at Goldsmiths Patrick Fagan suggests that children aged between 7 and 14 experienced twice the cognitive processing speed and performed better in tests after watching 20 minutes of a 3D film.
This suggests that children's attention spans have shortened in the last decade due to unlimited access to entertainment,including on-demand TV,gaming and social media.
A 2015 study claimed that watching 3D content had a similar effect to brain-training exercises.
Consumer psychologist Mr Fagan said that the increased stimulation found in watching something in 3D "exercised" the brain and improved performance in the short term.
3D films can play the role of brain-training "games and help to make children 'smarter' in the short term," he said. "The response speed after watching 3D was almost three times as quick as that gained from watching 2D; in other words,3D helps children process aspects of their environment more quickly.This is likely because 3D is a mentally exciting experience which 'gets the brain's juices flowing'."
1.How do we know the benefits of watching a 3D film?
A. Through introduction. B. By taking an exam.
C. Through research. D. By watching TV shows.
2.What's the meaning of the underlined word "stimulation" ?
A. Excitement. B. Contents.
C. Cost. D. Time.
3.Why does 3D have an advantage over 2D?
A. The time of watching 3D is short.
B. 3D can increase the reaction speed.
C. 3D can make children adapt the surroundings more quickly.
D. 3D can make more brain's power
4.What may be the best title for the text?
A. How 3D forms B. What are 3D films
C. A study on 3D films D. 3D films benefit children
高三英语阅读理解困难题查看答案及解析
e old songs. Today you hear these terrible machines going night and day. We will not have a vocal cord (声带) left.”
r people do in front of us. It has become a radically virtual medium, an art without a face.