↑ 收起筛选 ↑
试题详情

Back in 1975, economists planned rising life expectancy (预期寿命) against countries’ wealth, and concluded that wealth itself increases longevity. It seemed self- evident: everything people need to be healthy--from food to medical care- costs money.

But it soon proved that the data didn't always fit that theory. Economic booms didn’t always mean longer lives. In addition, for reasons that weren’t clear, a given gain in gross domestic product (GDP) caused increasingly higher gains in life expectancy over time, as though it was becoming cheaper to add years of life. Moreover, in the 1980s researchers found gains in learning were associated with greater increases in life expectancy than gains in wealth were. Finally, the more educated people in any country tend to live longer than their less educated fellow citizens. But such people also tend to be wealthier, so it has been difficult to make out which factor is increasing lifespan.

Wolfgang Lutz and his colleagues have now done that by collecting average data on GDP per person,lifespan, and years of education from 174 countries, dating from 1970 to 2010. They found that, just as in 1975, wealth associated with longevity. But the association between longevity and years of schooling was closer, with a direct relationship that did not change over time, the way wealth does.

Lutz argues that because schooling happens many years before a person has attained their life expectancy, this association reflects cause: better education drives longer life. It also leads to more wealth, which is why wealth and longevity are also associated. But what is important, says Lutz, is that wealth does not seem to be longevity, as experts thought- in fact, education is driving both of them.

He thinks this is because education permanently improves a person’s cognitive abilities, allowing better planning and self-control throughout the rest of their life. This idea is supported by the fact that people who are more intelligent appear to live longer.

1.Which of the following best describes economists ’conclusion in 1975?

A.Lifespan could be increased by wealth.

B.Economic growth didn’t always mean longer life.

C.Education influenced longevity more than wealth did.

D.A given growth in GDP caused higher gains in longevity.

2.What did Wolfgang Lutz and his colleagues find?

A.Wealth and longevity did not have any association.

B.Longevity and education were more closely associated.

C.Differences in wealth predicted differences in longevity.

D.Relationship between education and longevity changed over time.

3.What part does education play permanently according to Lutz?

A.It enables people to have better planning and self-control.

B.It always leads to a longer but not necessarily richer life.

C.It improves people’s imaginative and innovative abilities.

D.It helps people acquire time-managing and learning habits.

4.Which of the following is the best title for this passage?

A.Wealth influences longevity.

B.Education influences longevity.

C.Wealth has nothing to do with longevity.

D.The relationship between education and wealth.

高三英语阅读理解中等难度题

少年,再来一题如何?
试题答案
试题解析
相关试题