-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then resulted in a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs was stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Beijing section of Jingha expressway.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast one in Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations (协商) with the truck driver and a philanthropic (慈善) founda tion, Shangshan Foundation purchased these dogs with much money. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA) , being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the dog saving mission was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing too much attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger "Xiaowulaitajie" said on China's twitter-like website, weibo. com, "Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media attention. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people. "
Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief. "
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics. They argue that such act nevertheless embodies social progress.
A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not go against taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1.. According to the passage, we know the article probably comes from________ .
A. a science fiction B. a TV programme
C. the Internet D. a magazine
2.. Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined word “embodies”?
A. express. B. share.
C. emphasize. D. prevent.
3.. Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A. Some net users'. B. Liluping's.
C. Broken bridge 's. D. Xiaowulaitajie's.
4.. What does the passage mainly talk about?
A. Why some people disagree to save the 500 dogs.
B. How the volunteers saved the 500 dogs to be killed.
C. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
D. Different Chinese net users have different opinions on the mission.
-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization.
The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha Expressway Beijing section.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp.and a philanthropic foundation, Shang shan Foundation purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan.Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the “dog saving mission” is placing overt attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China's twitter like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”
Another microblogger, Liluping, said “We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs.I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief.”
Some applaud volunteers'actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those “saving dogs” critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless promotes social progress.
A microblogger named “broken bridge” said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people.Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal.Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1.Where did the article come from?
A.A storybook. B.A novel.
C.Internet. D.A magazine.
2.Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined phrase “run counter
to” in the last but one paragraph？
A.meet with B.go against
C.agree with D.come across
3.Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A.Some net users'. B.Broken bridge's.
C.Liluping's. D.Xiaowulaitajie's.
4.The following statements are TRUE except _______.
A.All the people don't think it right to save these dogs with so much money.
B.More than 25,000,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.
C.These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
D.Some people think it better to spend the money in helping the needy people.
-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization.
The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha Expressway Beijing section.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shang shan Foundation purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the eadquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the “dog saving mission” is placing overt attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China's twitter like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”
Another microblogger, Liluping, said “We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief.”
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those “saving dogs” critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless promotes social progress.
A microblogger named “broken bridge” said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1.Where did the article come from?
A. A storybook. B. A novel.
C. Internet. D. A magazine.
2.Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined phrase “run counter to” in the last but one paragraph?
A. meet with B. go against
C. agree with D. come across
3.Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A. Some net users'. B. Broken bridge's.
C. Liluping's. D. Xiaowulaitajie's.
4.The following statements are TRUE except _______.
A. All the people don't think it right to save these dogs with so much money.
B. More than 25,000,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.
C. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
D. Some people think it better to spend the money in helping the needy people.
-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization.
The incident then triggered a debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha Expressway Beijing section. Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shang shan Foundation purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs is worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.Some net users argue the “dog saving mission” is placing overattention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China's twitter like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”Another microblogger, Liluping, said “We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money was spent on disaster relief.”
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those “saving dogs” critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless promotes social progress.
A microblogger named “broken bridge” said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1.Where did the article come from?
A. A storybook.
B. A novel.
C. The Internet.
D. A magazine.
2.Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined phrase “run counter to” in the last but one paragraph?
A. meet with
B. agree with
C. go against
D. come across
3.The following statements are TRUE except .
A. These dogs were finally saved and adopted.
B. More than 25,000,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.
C. All the people don't think it right to save these dogs with so much money.
D. Some people think it better to spend the money in helping the needy people.
-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha expressway Beijing section. Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CS APA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing over attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China’s twitter-like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”
Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief."
Some applaud volunteers’ actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless embodies social progress.
A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal .Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1.Where did the article come from ___________?
A. newspaper B. Internet
C. a TV programme D. a magazine
2. Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A. Some net users' B. Xiaowulaitajie's
C. Liluping's D. Broken bridge's
3.Which statement is TRUE according to the passage?
A. All the people think it right to save these dogs with so much money.
B. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
C. Some volunteers support the actions to save these dogs and the people who offered their helping hands to those saved dogs.
D. 100,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.
-
Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization.
The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.
On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha Expressway Beijing section.
Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin Province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.
After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp.and a philanthropic foundation, Shang shan Foundation purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CSAPA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.
After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.
Some net users argue the “dog saving mission” is placing overt attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.
A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China's twitter like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”
Another microblogger, Liluping, said “We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief.”
Some applaud volunteers' actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.
Still many disapprove those “saving dogs” critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless promotes social progress.
A microblogger named “broken bridge” said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.
I think people and animals are created equal. Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.
1..Where did the article come from?
A. A storybook. B. A novel.
C. Internet. D. A magazine.
2..Which one has the similar meaning to the underlined phrase “run counter to” in the last but one paragraph？
A. meet with B. go against
C. agree with D. come across
3..Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?
A. Some net users'. B. Broken bridge's.
C. Liluping's. D. Xiaowulaitajie's.
4..The following statements are TRUE except _______.
A. All the people don't think it right to save these dogs with so much money.
B. More than 25,000,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.
C. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.
D. Some people think it better to spend the money in helping the needy people
-
A butcher was really surprised when he saw a dog coming inside the shop. He went over to the dog and noticed it had a _______ in its mouth. He took the note, which _______ “Can I have twelve sausages and a leg of lamb, please. The dog has ______ in his mouth.” _______, there was really a ten-dollar note there. So he took the money and put the sausages and lamb in a bag, placing it in the dog’s mouth. The butcher was so ______. He decided to follow the dog.
He followed the dog to a bus stop. The dog stopped and started looking at the ______. The dog checked out the time, and then sat on one of the benches _______ . Along came a bus. The dog went around to the front, looked at the number and ________. The butcher, by now, ________, followed it onto the bus.
The bus traveled through the town and out into the suburb. _______ it got off with the_______ still in its mouth. Several minutes later, the dog turned into a house. It walked up the path, and dropped the bag on the _______. Then it walked back down the path, quickly _______ for the door, and ______ itself against the door. But there’s no answer at the house, so the dog had to wait at the door.
After a while, there finally was a _______ to the situation. A big guy opened the door, and started kicking the dog and ______ him. The butcher ran up, and said “Why do you shout at the dog? It is really a _______.” The guy responded, “You call this clever? This is the second time this week that this _______ dog’s forgotten its _______.” On the way back home, the butcher thought to himself, “Greed may ________ have limits for the dog owner.”
1.A. tip B. note C. parcel D. list
2.A. knew B. wrote C. read D. felt
3.A. money B. coins C. bones D. gold
4.A. Unexpectedly B. Undoubtedly C. Disappointingly D. Surprisingly
5.A. curious B. dangerous C. ashamed D. frightened
6.A. number B. timetable C. post D. bus
7.A. patiently B. anxiously C. restlessly D. painfully
8.A. flew off B. got off C. came on D. climbed on
9.A. open-minded B. open-ended C. open-mouthed D. open-hearted
10.A. Finally B. Firstly C. Secondly D. Thirdly
11.A. sausage B. bone C. ticket D. bag
12.A. balcony B. step C. ceiling D. wall
13.A. paid B. applied C. dashed D. asked
14.A. enjoyed B. amused C. taught D. threw
15.A. starting point B. turning point C. bottom line D. front line
16.A. comforting B. praising C. scolding D. admiring
17.A. servant B. genius C. master D. butcher
18.A. stupid B. clever C. unforgettable D. thoughtful
19.A. mission B. aim C. key D. route
20.A. still B. even C. ever D. never
-
A butcher watching over his shop was really surprised when he saw a dog coming inside the shop. He went over to the dog and noticed it had a note in its mouth. He took the note and it read “Can I have 12 sausages and a leg of lamb, please. The dog has money in his mouth, as well.”
The butcher looked carefully and was surprised to find that there was really a ten-dollar note there. So he took the money and put the sausages and lamb in a bag, placing it in the dog’s mouth. The butcher was so impressed, and since it was about closing time, he decided to shut up shop and follow the dog.
So off he went. He followed the dog to a bus stop. The dog stopped and started looking at the timetable. The dog checked out the time, and then sat on one of the seats provided. Along came a bus. The dog walked around to the front, looked at the number, and went back to its seat. Another bus came. Again the dog went around to the front, looked at the number and climbed on. The butcher, by now, open-mouthed, followed it onto the bus.
The bus traveled through the town and out into the suburbs. Eventually the dog got up, and moved to the front of the bus. It stood on two back paws and pushed the button to stop the bus. Then it got off with groceries still in its mouth.
Well, the dog and the butcher were walking along the road, and then the dog turned into a house. It walked up the path, and dropped the groceries on the step. Then it walked back down the path, took a big run, and threw itself against the door. Then again, it threw himself against it. There’s no answer at the house. so the dog waited at the door.
The butcher watched as a big guy opened the door, and started shouting at it. The butcher ran up, and stopped the guy. “Why do you shout at the dog? It is really a genius.” The guy responded, “You call this clever? This is the second time this week that this stupid dog’s forgotten its key.”
1.Which may be the best title of the passage?
A. A clever dog. B. A curious butcher.
C. A cruel owner. D. A second lost key.
2.Why was the butcher surprised when he saw the dog?
A. Because there was a note in the dog’s mouth.
B. Because a dog was not supposed to come into his shop alone.
C. Because the dog was not afraid of being butchered.
D. Because the dog could read.
3.The passage implies that _________.
A. dogs are cleverer than man
B. dogs are our best friend
C. the butcher is a cruel person
D. some people are never satisfied with what they have got
4.The dog threw itself against the door, because _________.
A. it wanted to force the door open
B. it wanted its owner to open the door
C. it wanted to punish itself for forgetting the key
D. it wanted to get the butcher’s help
5.Which of the following statements is NOT true?
A. The butcher was curious so he followed the dog.
B. The dog didn’t get on the first bus because it was the wrong number.
C. To get off the bus, you should let the driver know by pressing the button.
D. The dog would be driven away by the big guy.
-
A butcher watching over his shop was really surprised when he saw a dog coming inside the shop. He went over to the dog and noticed it had a note in its mouth. He took the note and it read “Can I have 12 sausages and a leg of lamb, please. The dog has money in his mouth, as well.”
The butcher looked carefully and was surprised to find that there was really a ten-dollar note there. So he took the money and put the sausages and lamb in a bag, placing it in the dog’s mouth. The butcher was so impressed, and since it was about closing time, he decided to shut up shop and follow the dog.
So off he went. He followed the dog to a bus stop. The dog stopped and started looking at the timetable. The dog checked out the time, and then sat on one of the seats provided. Along came a bus. The dog walked around to the front, looked at the number, and went back to its seat. Another bus came. Again the dog went around to the front, looked at the number and climbed on. The butcher, by now, open-mouthed, followed it onto the bus.
The bus traveled through the town and out into the suburbs. Eventually the dog got up, and moved to the front of the bus. It stood on two back paws and pushed the button to stop the bus. Then it got off with groceries still in its mouth.
Well, the dog and the butcher were walking along the road, and then the dog turned into a house. It walked up the path, and dropped the groceries on the step. Then it walked back down the path, took a big run, and threw itself against the door. Then again, it threw himself against it. There’s no answer at the house. so the dog waited at the door.
The butcher watched as a big guy opened the door, and started shouting at it. The butcher ran up, and stopped the guy. “Why do you shout at the dog? It is really a genius.” The guy responded, “You call this clever? This is the second time this week that this stupid dog’s forgotten its key.”
1.Which may be the best title of the passage?
A．A clever dog. B．A curious butcher.
C．A cruel owner. D．A second lost key.
2.Why was the butcher surprised when he saw the dog?
A．Because there was a note in the dog’s mouth.
B．Because a dog was not supposed to come into his shop alone.
C．Because the dog was not afraid of being butchered.
D．Because the dog could read.
3.The passage implies that _________.
A．dogs are cleverer than man
B．dogs are our best friend
C．the butcher is a cruel person
D．some people are never satisfied with what they have got
4.The dog threw itself against the door, because _________.
A．it wanted to force the door open
B．it wanted its owner to open the door
C．it wanted to punish itself for forgetting the key
D．it wanted to get the butcher’s help
5.Which of the following statements is NOT true?
A．The butcher was curious so he followed the dog.
B．The dog didn’t get on the first bus because it was the wrong number.
C．To get off the bus, you should let the driver know by pressing the button.
D．The dog would be driven away by the big guy.
-
John brought over my letter _______ to him by mistake.
A. delivered B. to be delivered
C. delivering D. having delivered