Imagine you enter a car with no steering wheel, no brake or accelerator pedals ( 踏 板 ). Under a voice-activated command, you say an address. “The fastest route will take us 15.3 minutes. Should I take it?” You say “yes” and you are on your way. The car responds and starts moving all by itself. All you have to do is to sit back and relax.
How strange would it be if, one day in the future, everyone had such a car? No crazy driving, no quarrels, no cutting in; traffic laws would be respected and driving much safer. On the other hand, imagine the cost savings for local police enforcement (强制执行) and town budgets without all those speeding and parking tickets.
A new technology has the potential to change modern society thoroughly. There’s no question that self-driving vehicles could be an enormous benefit. The potential for safer cars means accident statistics would drop: some 94% of road accidents in the U.S. involve human error. Older drivers and visually- or physically-disabled people would gain a new level of freedom. Maintaining safe speeds and being electric, self-driving cars would sharply reduce pollution levels and dependency on non-renewable fuels. Roads would be quieter, people safer.
But we must also consider the impact of the new technology on those who now depend on driving for their living. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, in May 2015 there were 505,560 registered school bus drivers. The American Trucking Association lists approximately 3.5 million professional truck drivers in the U.S. The companies developing self-driving vehicles should be partnering with state and federal authorities to offer retraining for this massive workforce, many of whom will be displaced by the new technology.
New technologies will, and should, be developed. This is how society moves forward. However, progress can’t be one-sided. It is necessary for the companies and state agencies involved to consider the moral consequences of these potential changes to build a better future for all.
1.What would be the effect of the wide use of driverless cars?
A. More policemen would inspect the streets.
B. People would never feel angry about the traffic.
C. It would save local governments a lot of money.
D. Traffic regulations would be a thing of the past.
2.How would the elderly and the disabled benefit from driverless cars?
A. They would get rid of air pollution. B. They could enjoy greater mobility.
C. They would suffer no road accidents. D. They could go anywhere they want.
3.What would be the negative effect of driverless cars?
A. The conflict between labor and management would sharpen.
B. Many drivers would have to find new ways of earning a living.
C. Drivers would have a hard time adapting to new road conditions.
D. The gap between various departments of society would be widened.
4.What does the author suggest businesses and the government do?
A. Enable everyone to benefit from new technologies.
B. Keep pace with technological developments.
C. Make new technologies affordable to everyone.
D. Popularize the use of new technologies and devices.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题
Imagine you enter a car with no steering wheel, no brake or accelerator pedals ( 踏 板 ). Under a voice-activated command, you say an address. “The fastest route will take us 15.3 minutes. Should I take it?” You say “yes” and you are on your way. The car responds and starts moving all by itself. All you have to do is to sit back and relax.
How strange would it be if, one day in the future, everyone had such a car? No crazy driving, no quarrels, no cutting in; traffic laws would be respected and driving much safer. On the other hand, imagine the cost savings for local police enforcement (强制执行) and town budgets without all those speeding and parking tickets.
A new technology has the potential to change modern society thoroughly. There’s no question that self-driving vehicles could be an enormous benefit. The potential for safer cars means accident statistics would drop: some 94% of road accidents in the U.S. involve human error. Older drivers and visually- or physically-disabled people would gain a new level of freedom. Maintaining safe speeds and being electric, self-driving cars would sharply reduce pollution levels and dependency on non-renewable fuels. Roads would be quieter, people safer.
But we must also consider the impact of the new technology on those who now depend on driving for their living. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, in May 2015 there were 505,560 registered school bus drivers. The American Trucking Association lists approximately 3.5 million professional truck drivers in the U.S. The companies developing self-driving vehicles should be partnering with state and federal authorities to offer retraining for this massive workforce, many of whom will be displaced by the new technology.
New technologies will, and should, be developed. This is how society moves forward. However, progress can’t be one-sided. It is necessary for the companies and state agencies involved to consider the moral consequences of these potential changes to build a better future for all.
1.What would be the effect of the wide use of driverless cars?
A. More policemen would inspect the streets.
B. People would never feel angry about the traffic.
C. It would save local governments a lot of money.
D. Traffic regulations would be a thing of the past.
2.How would the elderly and the disabled benefit from driverless cars?
A. They would get rid of air pollution. B. They could enjoy greater mobility.
C. They would suffer no road accidents. D. They could go anywhere they want.
3.What would be the negative effect of driverless cars?
A. The conflict between labor and management would sharpen.
B. Many drivers would have to find new ways of earning a living.
C. Drivers would have a hard time adapting to new road conditions.
D. The gap between various departments of society would be widened.
4.What does the author suggest businesses and the government do?
A. Enable everyone to benefit from new technologies.
B. Keep pace with technological developments.
C. Make new technologies affordable to everyone.
D. Popularize the use of new technologies and devices.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
Imagine you enter a car with no steering wheel, no brake or accelerator pedals (踏板). Under a voice-activated command, you say an address. “The fastest route will take us 15.3 minutes. Should I take it?” You say “yes” and you are on your way. The car responds and starts moving all by itself. All you have to do is sit back and relax.
How weird would it be if, one day in the future, everyone had such a car? No crazy driving, no insults, no cutting in; traffic laws would be respected and driving much safer. On the other hand, imagine the cost savings for local police enforcement and town budgets without all those speeding and parking tickets.
A new technology has the potential to change modern society in radical ways. There’s no question that self-driving vehicles could be an enormous benefit. The potential for safer cars means accident statistics would drop: some 94% of road accidents in the U.S involve human error. Older drivers and visually- or physically-impaired people would gain a new level of freedom. Maintaining safe speeds and being electric, self-driving cars would drastically reduce pollution levels and dependency on non-renewable fuels. Roads would be quieter, people safer.
But we must also consider the impact of the new technology on those who now depend on driving for their livelihoods. According to the U.S. Department of Labor. In May 2015 there were 505,560 registered school bus drivers. The American Trucking association lists approximately 3.5 million professional truck drivers in the U.S.
The companies developing self-driving vehicles should be partnering with state and federal authorities to offer retraining for this massive workforce, many of whom will be displaced by the new technology. This is similar to what’s happening in the coal and oil industries, a situation that fuels much of the current political discontent in this country.
New technologies will, and should, be developed. This is how society moves forward. However, progress can’t be one-sided. It is necessary for the companies and state agencies involved to consider the ethical consequences of these potential changes to build a better future for all.
1.What would be the impact of the extensive use of driverless car?
A.People would be driving in a more civilized way.
B.It would save local governments a lot of money.
C.More policemen would be patrolling the streets.
D.Traffic regulations would be a thing of the past.
2.How would the elderly and the disabled benefit from driverless cars?
A.They could enjoy greater mobility.
B.They would suffer no road accidents.
C.They would have no trouble driving.
D.They could go anywhere they want.
3.What is the result of the introduction of new technologies in energy industries?
A.Political dissatisfaction. B.Retraining of employees.
C.Fossil fuel conservation. D.Business restructuring.
4.What would be the negative impact of driverless cars?
A.The conflict between labor and management would intensify.
B.The gap between various sectors of society would be widened.
C.Professional drivers would have a hard time adapting to new road conditions.
D.Numerous professional drivers would have to find new ways of earning a living.
5.What does the author suggest businesses and the government do?
A.Keep pace with technological developments.
B.Make new technologies affordable to everyone.
C.Enable everyone to benefit from new technologies.
D.Popularize the use of new technologies and devices
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
Google’s self-driving car is designed to work without a gas pedal(踏板)or steering wheel(方向盘). Now, the company has confirmed that the car doesn’t have any windscreen wipers either, because there’s no need for passengers to see where they are being driven.
The car requires no input from a driver, other than telling it the destination. There is no driving in the way we know it and all people inside the cars will be passengers who can spend their time paying no attention to the road. While the car may not need windscreen wipers, the lack of them may make passengers feel helpless if they are unable to see where they are going clearly.
Google’s two-seater “bubble” cars have buttons to begin and end the drive, but no other controls. An on-board computer uses data from sensors, including radar(雷达)and cameras, to make turns and navigate its way around pedestrians and other vehicles. Under the vision made public by Google, passengers might set their destination by typing it into a map or using commands. The new car can’t go faster than 25 miles per hour(40 km/h). It is electric and has to be recharged after 80 miles(129 km). They can only be used in areas that have been thoroughly mapped by Google.
Google has been testing its self-driving cars since 2009 and its steering wheel-less sample since early this summer. It intends on making its driverless cars available to consumers in the next five years. The ultimate goal of the project is computer-controlled cars that can get rid of human error, which results in about 90 percent of the 1.2 million road deaths that occur worldwide each year and it was also inspiring to start with a blank sheet of paper.
1.Why may people feel helpless riding in Google’s self-driving car?
A. They have no idea of the destination. B. There are no other controls.
C. They are unable to see the road clearly. D. The car is traveling too fast.
2.What’s the main idea of the third paragraph?
A. The tests the car needs to pass.
B. What the drivers need to drive the car.
C. The development of the new car.
D. How Google’s self-driving car works.
3.How long can Google’s self-driving car travel before being recharged?
A. 25 miles. B. 40 miles. C. 80 miles. D. 129 miles.
4.What can we learn from the last paragraph?
A. Google began to test self-driving cars this summer.
B. The majority of the road deaths are caused by drivers.
C. Driver less cars will be available to consumers next year.
D. Google’s computer controlled cars fire the drivers’ inspiration.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
Can you imagine finishing 20 miles on two legs? With his car breaking down, Walter was left with no choice but to get to his first day of work: Walk. Figuring it would take _______ seven hours to be on time before 8 a. m. , the Alabama college student set out at_______.
“I occasionally _______ my decision. But I’m well _______ how much the job means to me,” Walter says. About 4 a. m. , four local policemen _______ him and learned about his story, full of _______.Although Walter didn't want to be a(n) _______ ,they gave him some food before driving him to a_______, a safe place for him to stay until morning. However, he left the church and started walking again after 20 minutes. When Scott, the police officer, was _______to take over work, he heard about Walter from his workmates. He picked up Walter and drove him his rest way. Despite walking for hours, Walter __________ to take a break and started to work before the rest of the crew arrived.
Walter’s new boss, Lamey, wrote on Facebook, “I can’t imagine how many times on that exhausting and __________ walk in the dark he wanted to turn back. But he __________ it to get here! " She was __________ by Walter. who desired to finish his bachelor’s degree after he and his mother__________ their home in Hurricane Katrina. Lamey added that she had started a Go Fund Me to help this hardworking boy with his __________. After seeing the __________ on Facebook, CEO Marklin presented his new __________employee with his personal car! Tears __________up in Carr’s eyes. “I don’t think that little walk so __________.” said Walter.
In fact, the barrier to one’s success often lies in himself. One could only be__________if he let himself be beaten.
1.A.hardly B.gradually C.exactly D.roughly
2.A.midnight B.dawn C.dusk D.noon
3.A.confirmed B.questioned C.hugest D.abandoned
4.A.aware B.contend C.guilty D.proud
5.A.caught B.recognized C.spotted D.searched
6.A.relief B.admiration C.gratitude D.curiosity
7.A.bother B.target C.enemy D.comfort
8.A.garage B.restaurant C.church D.farm
9.A.dropping in B.passing by C.checking in D.hanging out
10.A.stopped B.agreed C.desired D.rejected
11.A.casual B.enjoyable C.appealing D.lonely
12.A.won B.owed C.made D.loved
13.A.impressed B.motivated C.thrilled D.influenced
14.A.built B.lost C.destroyed D.sold
15.A.dignity B.growth C.occupation D.expenses
16.A.comment B.offer C.post D.motto
17.A.friendly B.devoted C.intelligent D.confused
18.A.welled B.rolled C.appeared D.lifted
19.A.relaxing B.special C.long D.demanding
20.A.rewarded B.awarded C.rescued D.defeated
高三英语完形填空中等难度题查看答案及解析
Can you imagine finishing 20 miles on two legs? With his car breaking down, Walter was left with no choice but to get to his first day of work: Walk. Figuring it would take _______ seven hours to be on time before 8 a.m., the Alabama college student set out at _______.
“I occasionally _______my decision. But I'm well _______ how much the job means to me, “Walter says. About 4a. m., four local policemen _______ him and learned about his story, full of _______. Although Walter didn't want to be a(n) _______,they gave him some food before driving him to a _______,a safe place for him to stay until morning.
However, he left the church and started walking again after 20 minutes. When Scott, the police officer, was _______to take over work, he heard about Walter from his workmates. He picked up Walter and drove him his rest way. Despite walking for hours, Walter ________ to take a break and started to work before the rest of the crew arrived.
Walter's new boss, Lamey, wrote on Facebook, “I can't imagine how many times on that exhausting and ________walk in the dark he wanted to turn back. But he ________it to get here! “She was ________by Walter, who desired to finish his bachelor's degree after he and his mother ________their home in Hurricane Katrina. Lamey added that she had started a GoFundMe to help this hardworking boy with his________. After seeing the ________on Facebook, CEO Marklin presented his new ________employee with his personal car! Tears ________up in Carr's eyes. “I don't think that little walk so ________.”said Walter.
In fact, the barrier to one's success often lies in himself. One could only be ________if he let himself be beaten.
1.A.hardly B.gradually C.exactly D.roughly
2.A.midnight B.dawn C.dusk D.noon
3.A.confirmed B.questioned C.changed D.abandoned
4.A.aware B.content C.guilty D.proud
5.A.caught B.recognized C.spotted D.searched
6.A.relief B.admiration C.gratitude D.curiosity
7.A.bother B.target C.enemy D.comfort
8.A.garage B.restaurant C.church D.farm
9.A.dropping in B.passing by C.checking in D.hanging out
10.A.stopped B.agreed C.desired D.rejected
11.A.casual B.enjoyable C.appealing D.lonely
12.A.won B.owed C.made D.loved
13.A.impressed B.motivated C.thrilled D.influenced
14.A.built B.lost C.destroyed D.sold
15.A.dignity B.growth C.occupation D.expenses
16.A.comment B.offer C.post D.motto
17.A.friendly B.devoted C.intelligent D.confused
18.A.welled B.rolled C.appeared D.lifted
19.A.relaxing B.special C.long D.demanding
20.A.rewarded B.awarded C.rescued D.defeated
高三英语完形填空中等难度题查看答案及解析
Patricia Blues, 29, has a new aim in life: to keep drivers' hands on their steering wheels and off their cell phones．On November 2, 2007, Blues lived through a horrible experience．A motorist dialing a cell phone drove through a stop sign at 45 miles per hour and run into the side of Blues' car．Blues' 2-year-old daughter was killed immediately in the crash．
Blues has since dedicated her time to pushing for laws that would prevent this type of tragedy from happening again．
Cell phones are not the only distractions （分神） that cause accidents．Eating, changing CD, reading maps, talking to passengers, and just reaching for an object on the floor can be dangerous．Therefore, the emphasis should be on educating drivers to avoid all distractions．However, talking on cell phones might be easier to regulate than eating or changing music．At least 34 states have already passed laws to restrict cell phone use in moving cars．No state has banned it yet, but several U．S．cities have．Worldwide, 13 nations, including Australia, England, Germany, Japan and China have banned drivers' use of cell phones in moving cars．
To date, no scientific evidence has been published showing that talking on the phone affects driving safety．But according to a test by some high school students, "driving while on the phone does affect safety and probably shouldn't be done"．
1.What happened to Patricia Blues last November? ____．
A．She was seriously injured in a car crash
B．She lost her daughter in a road accident
C．She broke the traffic rules at a bus stop
D．Her vehicle was destroyed by a motorbike
2.The tragedy was caused by ____．
A．Blues' lack of driving experience
B．the motorist’s failure of seeing the stop sign
C．Blues' poor car conditions
D．the motorist's absence of mind while driving
3.Patricia Blues' new goal of life is to persuade the government ____．
A．to prohibit the carrying of cell phones in cars
B．to educate drivers to avoid all distractions
C．to ban talking on the phone while driving
D．to study harmful results of using cell phones
4.Which of the following is TRUE according to the text? ____．
A．Using cell phone while driving is easier to be controlled by law than other distractions
B．It is more important to make laws than educate drivers to be aware of driving safety
C．Driving while on the phone is firmly against only by some students from high school
D．It is extremely urgent for the cities with a large population to restrict using cell phones
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
Patricia Blues, 29, has a new aim in life: to keep drivers' hands on their steering wheels and off their cell phones. On November 2, 2007, Blues lived through a horrible experience. A motorist dialing a cell phone drove through a stop sign at 45 miles per hour and run into the side of Blues' car. Blues' 2-year-old daughter was killed immediately in the crash.
Blues has since dedicated her time to pushing for laws that would prevent this type of tragedy from happening again.
Cell phones are not the only distractions (分神) that cause accidents. Eating, changing CD, reading maps, talking to passengers, and just reaching for an object on the floor can be dangerous. Therefore, the emphasis should be on educating drivers to avoid all distractions. However, talking on cell phones might be easier to regulate than eating or changing music. At least 34 states have already passed laws to restrict cell phone use in moving cars. No state has banned it yet, but several U. S. cities have. Worldwide, 13 nations, including Australia, England, Germany, Japan and China have banned drivers' use of cell phones in moving cars.
To date, no scientific evidence has been published showing that talking on the phone affects driving safety. But according to a test by some high school students, "driving while on the phone does affect safety and probably shouldn't be done".
1.What happened to Patricia Blues last November? ________.
A. She was seriously injured in a car crash
B. She lost her daughter in a road accident
C. She broke the traffic rules at a bus stop
D. Her vehicle was destroyed by a motorbike
2.The tragedy was caused by ________.
A. Blues' lack of driving experience
B. the motorist’s failure of seeing the stop sign
C. Blues' poor car conditions
D. the motorist's absence of mind while driving
3.Patricia Blues' new goal of life is to persuade the government ________.
A. to prohibit the carrying of cell phones in cars
B. to educate drivers to avoid all distractions
C. to ban talking on the phone while driving
D. to study, harmful results of using cell phones
4.Which of the following is TRUE according to the text? ________.
A. Using cell phone while driving is easier to be controlled by law than other distractions
B. It is more important to make laws than educate drivers to be aware of driving safety
C. Driving while on the phone is firmly against only by some students from high school
D. It is extremely urgent for the cities with a large population to restrict using cell phones
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
Patricia Blues, 29, has a new aim in life: to keep drivers' hands on their steering wheels and off their cell phones. On November 2, 2007, Blues lived through a horrible experience. A motorist dialing a cell phone drove through a stop sign at 45 miles per hour and run into the side of Blues' car. Blues' 2-year-old daughter was killed immediately in the crash.
Blues has since dedicated her time to pushing for laws that would prevent this type of tragedy from happening again.
Cell phones are not the only distractions (分神) that cause accidents. Eating, changing CD, reading maps, talking to passengers, and just reaching for an object on the floor can be dangerous. Therefore, the emphasis should be on educating drivers to avoid all distractions. However, talking on cell phones might be easier to regulate than eating or changing music. At least 34 states have already passed laws to restrict cell phone use in moving cars. No state has banned it yet, but several U. S. cities have. Worldwide, 13 nations, including Australia, England, Germany, Japan and China have banned drivers' use of cell phones in moving cars.
To date, no scientific evidence has been published showing that talking on the phone affects driving safety. But according to a test by some high school students, "driving while on the phone does affect safety and probably shouldn't be done".
64. What happened to Patricia Blues last November? ________.
A. She was seriously injured in a car crash
B. She lost her daughter in a road accident
C. She broke the traffic rules at a bus stop
D. Her vehicle was destroyed by a motorbike
65. The tragedy was caused by ________.
A. Blues' lack of driving experience
B. the motorist’s failure of seeing the stop sign
C. Blues' poor car conditions
D. the motorist's absence of mind while driving
66. Patricia Blues' new goal of life is to persuade the government ________.
A. to prohibit the carrying of cell phones in cars
B. to educate drivers to avoid all distractions
C. to ban talking on the phone while driving
D. to study, harmful results of using cell phones
67. Which of the following is TRUE according to the text? ________.
A. Using cell phone while driving is easier to be controlled by law than other distractions
B. It is more important to make laws than educate drivers to be aware of driving safety
C. Driving while on the phone is firmly against only by some students from high school
D. It is extremely urgent for the cities with a large population to restrict using cell phones
高三英语阅读理解简单题查看答案及解析
Cars produced today are essentially smartphones with wheels. For drivers, this has meant many new features: automatic braking (刹车), turn-by-turn directions, infotainment systems. But carmakers are getting much, much more; They’re constantly collecting data from our vehicles, like how much we weigh, how fast we drive, how many children we have-even financial information.
Debates around privacy often focus on companies like Facebook. But today’s connected cars-and tomorrow’s autonomous vehicles show how the commercial opportunities in collecting personal data are limitless. Your location data will allow companies to advertise to you based on where you live, work or frequently travel. Data gathered from voice-command technology could also be useful to advertisers. Data on your driving habits could be valuable to insurance companies. You may or may not choose to share your data with these services. But while you can turn off location data on your cellphone, there’s no such feature for your car.
Because of the increasing complexity of cars and the Internet of Things, data is critical to repair and service. When carmakers control the data, they can choose which service centers receive our information. They’re more likely to share our data only with their branded dealerships than with independent repair shops, which could have the edge in price and convenience.
It’s clear, because of its value-as high as $ 750 billion by 2030-carmakers are unlikely to release control of the data collected from our vehicles. Policymakers, however, have the opportunity to give drivers control-not just so that they can keep their data private but also so that they can share it with the people they want to see it. This will let car owners maintain what they’ve had for a century: the right to decide who fixes their car.
1.What can we learn about the vehicle data?
A.It is available and free to all.
B.It tends to put drivers at risk.
C.It brings drivers limitless profits.
D.It offers whatever the carmakers want.
2.What does the underlined phrase “have the edge” in Paragraph 3 mean?
A.Be weaker. B.Be worse.
C.Be better. D.Be safer.
3.What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.Car owners already have direct access to their vehicle data.
B.Drivers trade personal information for convenience.
C.Carmakers will share the vehicle data with drivers soon.
D.Laws are expected to bring the data back to drivers.
4.In which section of a newspaper may this text appear?
A.Entertainment. B.Health.
C.Education. D.Science.
高三英语阅读理解中等难度题查看答案及解析
You fix my what? It was to get my brakes repaired ____ I brought my car in, not to get the engine replaced!
A. so that B．when C．that D．because
高三英语单项填空中等难度题查看答案及解析