↑ 收起筛选 ↑
试题详情

The definition of the standard kilogram is fundamentally imperfect. Getting the definition right is a challenge that has tried the patience and intelligence of scientists for decades.

Scientists use just seven basic units to define all the other quantities we use --- quantities such as speed, density, or electric power. All of those basic units except the kilogram are themselves defined in terms of natural properties that are beyond human control.

For example, the standard second (time) is defined as a specific number of vibration of a type of radiation released by atoms of a special metal. The standard meter (length), in turn, is defined as the length of the path light travels in a vacuum during a specific fraction of a second.

Not so the kilogram. This orphan of the basic unit family is simply the mass of a small platinum-iridium alloy cylinder (铂-铱合金筒) locked away by the international Bureau of Weighs & Measures in France.

Embarrassingly, the last time the copies were brought for a checkup in the 1980s, officials found that some copies had gained about 20 parts per billion in weight compared to the master cylinder since the previous checkup in the 1940s. This implies that the master cylinder itself may be an inconstant standard.

No one knows what causes the weight changes. But the uncertainty can’t be tolerated when precision(精密度) in research and some manufacturing now demands accuracy to a few parts per billion.

Several efforts in several different countries are under way to redefine the kilogram in terms of basic physical quantities such as counting the actual number of atoms of a specific substance in a kilogram or the electromagnetic force that balances a kilogram mass against gravity.

A project of the latter type at the NIST laboratories in Gaithersburg hopes eventually to define mass in terms of electrical units. So far, none of these redefinition projects has borne fruit. They require precision of measurement and control of experimental conditions. The slightest pollution, tiny vibrations, or other influences --- even changes in weather --- can ruin results. You’ve got to hand it to scientists who are willing to devote many years to such painstaking but fundamentally important research.

1.Which of the following best paraphrases the sentence “Not so the kilogram.” in paragraph 4?

A.The kilogram is not as accurate as the standard second.

B.The kilogram is not universally accepted in the world.

C.The kilogram is not defined in terms of natural properties.

D.The kilogram is not well defined as time and length.

2.Which of the following can NOT be concluded from the passage?

A.Experiments are being carried out to redefine the kilogram.

B.The uncertainty in the standard kilogram can seriously affect some research.

C.The redefinition of the standard kilogram is quite complicated.

D.Scientists will achieve success in redefining the kilogram in the near future.

3.According to the passage, to define the weight of mass in terms of electrical units _______.

A.is one of the best methods to redefine the kilogram

B.has been accepted as the only possible redefinition project

C.is not as simple as what people can understand

D.has been considered by some scientists as a better approach

4.We can know from the passage that the redefinition of the kilogram is _________.

A.more important in keeping market honesty

B.worth years of scientists’ painstaking research

C.the urgent requirement of business and manufacturing.

D.bring about important and fruitful results

高三英语阅读理解中等难度题

少年,再来一题如何?
试题答案
试题解析
相关试题