↑ 收起筛选 ↑
试题详情

By now it’s almost common knowledge that spending time in nature is good for you. Areas with more trees tend to be less polluted, so spending time there allows you to breathe easier. Spending time outdoors has been linked with reduced blood pressure and stress, and seems to motivate people to exercise more. So it’ll come as no surprise that there's research showing that spending time in nature is good, which has been known for thousands of years. There’s dozens of papers showing that.

University of Exeter Medical School researcher Mathew P. White said “We get this idea, patients are coming to us and they’re saying, ‘doctor, how long should I spend?’and the doctor is saying, I don’t really know.” So White and his team decided to find out by using data collected from nearly 20,000 people in England through the Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey. And their answer? Two hours a week. People who spent at least that much time-either all at once or totaled over several shorter visits-were more likely to report good health and psychological well-being than those with no nature exposure. Remarkably, the researchers found that less than two hours offered no significant benefits.

So what’s so special about two hours? “ I have absolutely no idea. Really. We didn’t have an apriori(由因及果的)guess at what this would be. It emerged. And I’d be lying if I said we predicted this. I don’t know.” Even more noteworthy, the two-hour benchmark(基准)applied to men and women, to older and younger folks, to people from different ethnic backgrounds, occupational groups, socioeconomic levels and so on. Even people with long-term illnesses or disabilities benefited from time spent in nature—as long as it was at least 120 minutes per week.

While the findings are based on a tremendous number of people, nobody knows why or how nature has this benefit. “I want to be really clear about this. This is very early stages. We’re not saying everybody has to do 120. What research do we need to take this to the next step before doctors can have the true confidence to work with their patients? But it’ s certainly a starting point,” White said.

1.What is the first paragraph mainly about?

A.The benefits of spending time in nature.

B.The research of spending time in nature.

C.The characteristics of spending time in nature.

D.The common knowledge of spending time in nature.

2.What can we infer about the result of White and his team’s survey?

A.The time spent in nature should be 2 hours a week all at once.

B.2 hours a week at least in nature is beneficial to whomever you are.

C.The time spent in nature should be 2 hours a week, no more, no less.

D.2 hours a week in nature is too long for people with long-term illnesses.

3.What does White expect of the findings?

A.They will be in early stage.

B.They will be based on many people.

C.They will help all people go out in nature.

D.They will be improved and further research will be done.

4.Where is this text most likely from?

A.A diary B.A guidebook

C.A magazine D.A novel

高三英语阅读理解中等难度题

少年,再来一题如何?
试题答案
试题解析
相关试题